Removing Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on primary homes could unleash a wave of housing movement so powerful it would generate 38,000 new homes annually—a revelation that’s shaking up Britain’s stalled housing market. The finding, from the Adam Smith Institute, arrives just months before the November 2025 Budget, as the UK braces to miss its homebuilding target by more than 100,000 homes. With only 695,000 housing transactions completed in 2024/25—far below the 800,000 pre-2008 average—the system is creaking under its own weight. And the culprit? A tax that doesn’t just raise revenue, but traps families, chokes mobility, and quietly kills new construction.
Why Stamp Duty Is a Homebuyer’s Trap
It’s not just the cost—it’s the paralysis. The average buyer pays £4,547 in Stamp Duty, money that could’ve gone toward a deposit, lowered monthly mortgage payments, or even covered a move to a job across the country. But instead, people stay put. A 1% increase in Stamp Duty, research shows, knocks 10% off housing transactions. That’s not theory—it’s what happened in Scotland and Toronto, where similar taxes led to higher rents and fewer homeowners. In Toronto, buy-to-let properties surged while ownership stalled. Here, it’s the same: people who want to downsize after retirement, young couples needing more space, or workers relocating for opportunity—they’re all stuck.
Mitchell Palmer, economist at the Adam Smith Institute, puts it bluntly: "It punishes people moving towards opportunity and locks people in." He estimates that scrapping SDLT would trigger 349,000 extra sales a year. That’s not just more movement—it’s more homes built. Developers, freed from the glut of unsold existing stock, would finally have the incentive to break ground. And that’s where the 38,000 new homes come from—not magic, but math.
Political Momentum Builds for Reform
It’s not just economists saying this. Politicians are starting to talk like homeowners.
James Cleverly, Shadow Secretary of State for Housing, called Stamp Duty "one of the most damaging, un-Conservative taxes in Britain." He’s right—Conservatism has always been about aspiration. But right now, the tax makes it harder for a nurse in Manchester to move to a better-paid job in Leeds. It makes it impossible for a widower in Brighton to downsize into a manageable flat without losing half his equity to the Treasury.
Gareth Davies, MP for Grantham and Bourne, echoed that sentiment: "It’s a barrier we need to pull down for good." He’s not just speaking for pensioners—he’s speaking for every family who’s had to choose between staying in a two-bedroom flat or paying £10,000 in tax to move up.
Even British Progress, a think tank with no ideological axe to grind, found that scrapping SDLT wouldn’t just help buyers—it would boost Treasury revenue. Their analysis suggests replacing SDLT with a smarter, more stable property tax system could generate £1.7 billion more in year one, climbing to £8 billion annually by 2050. That’s not a loss—it’s a win. And it comes with lower long-term borrowing costs and more predictable income for the government.
The 2025 Tax Bomb: First-Time Buyers Hit Hardest
But here’s the twist: instead of fixing the system, the government is making it worse.
Effective April 1, 2025, the first-time buyer threshold drops from £425,000 to £300,000. That means a homebuyer purchasing a brand-new £413,000 house—the national average—will now pay £5,650 in Stamp Duty. Before, they paid nothing. Now? They’re taxed like a second-home buyer. The percentage of first-time buyers paying SDLT will jump from 21% to 42%. That’s not a policy—it’s a betrayal.
Meanwhile, mortgage payments for first-time buyers have surged 61% over five years. Wages? Up just 27%. And the Higher Rate Additional Duty is rising to 5%. Overseas buyers? Their surcharge jumps from 3% to 5%. The non-domicile tax status? Gone. The message? The government isn’t trying to help people buy homes. It’s trying to make them unaffordable for everyone except the ultra-rich.
An Alternative: Tax for Energy, Not Ownership
Not everyone agrees with scrapping Stamp Duty outright. Tax Research UK proposes a smarter path: replace it with a levy on second-hand homes—but let buyers reclaim it if they install energy efficiency upgrades. Think of it like a green rebate. If you swap your windows, add insulation, or install a heat pump, you get your tax back. That’s policy with teeth: it reduces emissions, cuts bills, and keeps money circulating locally.
They also suggest tying Planning Consent to a "Citizens Mortgage"—a new kind of loan that includes unemployment and illness protection. That’s not just housing reform. It’s security reform. And it’s something the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has quietly been pushing for years: housing isn’t just bricks and mortar. It’s stability.
What’s Next? The November 2025 Crossroads
The government has two choices. Double down on a broken tax that punishes aspiration. Or listen to economists, MPs, and millions of trapped families—and scrap it.
The data is clear: removing Stamp Duty doesn’t just help buyers. It fuels construction, boosts mobility, and even increases tax revenue. The only thing holding back 38,000 new homes isn’t land, labor, or materials. It’s a tax written in 1990 that no one believes in anymore.
November 2025 isn’t just a budget date. It’s a turning point. Will the Chancellor choose revenue over reality? Or will he finally admit that the UK’s housing crisis isn’t about supply—it’s about a tax that’s killing movement?
Frequently Asked Questions
How would abolishing Stamp Duty create 38,000 new homes?
Removing Stamp Duty would increase homeowner mobility by 56%, leading to 349,000 extra housing sales annually. Developers, facing higher demand for new builds instead of existing stock, would shift investment toward construction. The Adam Smith Institute estimates this shift would directly enable 38,000 new homes per year—not by mandate, but by market response.
Why is the 2025 Stamp Duty change hurting first-time buyers?
The threshold for first-time buyer relief dropped from £425,000 to £300,000. That means the average new build home—priced at £413,000—now incurs £5,650 in tax, up from £0. The proportion of first-time buyers paying SDLT will nearly double, from 21% to 42%, just as mortgage costs have risen 61% since 2020 while wages grew only 27%.
Does Stamp Duty actually raise significant revenue?
In 2024/25, SDLT raised around £14 billion, but at a huge economic cost: reduced mobility, fewer transactions, and stalled construction. British Progress estimates replacing it with a smarter property tax could generate £1.7 billion more in year one and £8 billion more annually by 2050, while also lowering long-term borrowing costs for the Treasury.
What’s the impact on overseas buyers and second homes?
The overseas buyer surcharge rose to 5% in 2025, and the second-home surcharge remains at 3%, meaning foreign investors now pay up to 8% extra. This has slashed overseas purchases to record lows, according to Hamptons. But while this reduces demand from investors, it doesn’t help domestic buyers—it just shifts the imbalance without solving the core issue: lack of supply and mobility.
Could replacing Stamp Duty with an energy-based levy work?
Yes, according to Tax Research UK. Their proposal would tax second-hand homes but refund the levy if the buyer installs energy efficiency upgrades like insulation or heat pumps. This would cut emissions, reduce energy bills, and stimulate green construction—all while keeping revenue stable. It’s a policy that rewards action, not ownership.
Why hasn’t the government acted on this yet?
Stamp Duty is politically safe—it’s a visible, easy-to-collect tax that affects relatively few voters at any one time. But it’s economically toxic. The delay stems from inertia, not evidence. With the November 2025 Budget looming, pressure is mounting for reform. The question isn’t whether it’s needed—it’s whether politicians have the courage to admit the tax is broken.
Bennett Kincaid
Hi, I'm Bennett Kincaid, an accomplished sports enthusiast with a passion for motorsports. I've been following the world of racing for over a decade, and I love sharing my insights and experiences with fellow fans. My expertise in sports allows me to understand the intricacies of the game and provide in-depth analysis. When I'm not attending races or writing about them, you can find me coaching local youth sports teams or enjoying a pick-up game with friends. My ultimate goal is to continue fostering the growth of motorsports and inspiring the next generation of athletes.
view all postsWrite a comment